[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: OSO on CentOS 6.x?



Harrison, Troy, et. al.

I had the same issues.  Had to massage the code to pass the test statements for the preflight stuff -- but it still bombed. 

I wiped the VM, and will be trying again later today.  Will keep you informed.

Thanks,

MM


> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:36:58 -0600
> From: tdawson redhat com
> To: hripps redhat com
> CC: michael mcconachie hotmail com; dev lists openshift redhat com
> Subject: Re: OSO on CentOS 6.x?
>
> On 11/11/2013 07:35 AM, N. Harrison Ripps wrote:
> > Hey Mike--
> >
> > On Nov 11, 2013, at 1:50 , The Dude <michael mcconachie hotmail com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> ....Please don't shoot the messenger. I have been tasked (kicking
> >> and screaming) with identifying and verifying an install procedure
> >> for OSO 2.0 on Centos (Puppet, Ansible, BASH based, w/e).
> >
> > Why shoot the messenger? Red Hat <3's CentOS:
> > http://readwrite.com/2013/08/13/red-hat-ceo-centos-open-source#awesm=~omTea6wvHTZNbg
> >
> >
> >> At one time vagrant was the culprit of failed (puppet driven)
> >> installs. Krishna, Jamey, Ben Klank, and Ben Langfeld fixed it
> >> several months ago. Info can be found here --->
> >> https://github.com/worldline/openshift-vagrant-centos. Has anyone
> >> had recent success re: installing 2.0 on CentOS since then?
> >
> > Have you tried this with oo-install yet? Krishna can correct me if
> > I'm out to lunch on this, and I'll set up a test case right now, but
> > my understanding is that oo-install's (Puppet-based) Origin
> > installation workflow functions correctly on RHEL, so it -should-
> > function correctly on CentOS. Anyone who knows better, please feel
> > free to contradict me...
> >
> > --Harrison
> >
>
> Hi Harrison,
> When I tried it before on Scientific Linux it wouldn't define Scientific
> Linux as a "rhel" machine. I had to hack the code to fool it. After
> that, things ran fine.
>
> It looks like that section of code has changed, but I believe it still
> will not recognize either Scientific Linux or CentOS as a rhel machine.
>
> Troy
> p.s. I will verify later today if needs be, but right now my virtual
> machine is misbehaving.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]