[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

RE: OSO on CentOS 6.x?



Steve,

 

Thanks for the info. Thanks for your effort and time in replying!

 

(Looks like the bot merged your changes ~6 hours ago to 'master'. Awesome, and how timely?)

 

I'll let you know if it works for me or not.

 

Mike

 

 


Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:44:20 -0500
Subject: Re: OSO on CentOS 6.x?
From: steven merrill gmail com
To: tdawson redhat com
CC: dev lists openshift redhat com

Troy and Mike,

I have definitely hit https://github.com/openshift/origin-server/pull/4150 before on CentOS (as well as a few issues with private keys in openshift.conf and the older revision of the Puppet scripts) but I'm otherwise doing pretty well running Origin Release 2 on a cluster of CentOS 6.4 machines.


On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Troy Dawson <tdawson redhat com> wrote:
On 11/11/2013 07:35 AM, N. Harrison Ripps wrote:
Hey Mike--

On Nov 11, 2013, at 1:50 , The Dude <michael mcconachie hotmail com>
wrote:

Hi all,

....Please don't shoot the messenger.  I have been tasked (kicking
and screaming) with identifying and verifying an install procedure
for OSO 2.0 on Centos (Puppet, Ansible, BASH based, w/e).

Why shoot the messenger? Red Hat <3's CentOS:
http://readwrite.com/2013/08/13/red-hat-ceo-centos-open-source#awesm=~omTea6wvHTZNbg


At one time vagrant was the culprit of failed (puppet driven)
installs.  Krishna, Jamey, Ben Klank, and Ben Langfeld fixed it
several months ago.  Info can be found here --->
https://github.com/worldline/openshift-vagrant-centos.  Has anyone
had recent success re: installing 2.0 on CentOS since then?

Have you tried this with oo-install yet? Krishna can correct me if
I'm out to lunch on this, and I'll set up a test case right now, but
my understanding is that oo-install's (Puppet-based) Origin
installation workflow functions correctly on RHEL, so it -should-
function correctly on CentOS. Anyone who knows better, please feel
free to contradict me...

--Harrison


Hi Harrison,
When I tried it before on Scientific Linux it wouldn't define Scientific Linux as a "rhel" machine.  I had to hack the code to fool it.  After that, things ran fine.

It looks like that section of code has changed, but I believe it still will not recognize either Scientific Linux or CentOS as a rhel machine.

Troy
p.s. I will verify later today if needs be, but right now my virtual machine is misbehaving.


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev lists openshift redhat com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev



--
Thanks,

Steven Merrill
steven merrill gmail com

_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev lists openshift redhat com http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/dev

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]