[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: NSQ cluster



You would need multiple replication controllers today (with 1 replica)
to address multiple PVCs, yes.  There's a strong desire to fix this
with nominal services and other related changes, but it's not there
yet.

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Philippe Lafoucrière
<philippe lafoucriere tech-angels com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're about to use nsq in openshift, and found these manifests:
> https://gist.github.com/bketelsen/a2d353d0318736c9fa23
>
> I have posted a comment to the author, but he didn't answer:
>
> "Hey, I really don't get how this could work with several replicas. Could
> you explain how you managed to notify all the (3 replicas of) nslookupd when
> nsqd is starting?
> Also pod IPs are considered ephemeral, what IP do the 5 replicas of nsqd
> register? If it's the ip of the service, what's the point of having
> nslookupd?
> Finally, the 5 nsqd replicas are sharing a single PV, this will lead to io
> error as soon as 2 servers will write at the same place, how do you handle
> that?
> Thanks for your insights."
>
> Am I understanding something wrong?
> I don't think we can have one claim PER replica, right?
>
> Thanks,
> Philippe
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> users lists openshift redhat com
> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]