[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: oc v1.1.2-dirty



On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Den Cowboy <dencowboy hotmail com> wrote:
> So I have to wait until de right files are commited in the Git?

I think what Scott is saying is that those files are harmless in this
case.  I did hear he was planning to do another 1.1.2 build sometime
soon which should resolve this versioning problem.

>
>> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:12:20 -0500
>> Subject: Re: oc v1.1.2-dirty
>> From: sdodson redhat com
>> To: bleanhar redhat com
>> CC: dencowboy hotmail com; users lists openshift redhat com
>
>>
>> This is actually in the copr RPM build I had done. At the time that I
>> built the SRPM I had a new uncommitted file in my git checkout. I've
>> verified that the contents of the RPM are unaffected. We'll address
>> this release process deficiency as we get automated builds ready for
>> Centos.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Brenton Leanhardt <bleanhar redhat com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:07 AM, Den Cowboy <dencowboy hotmail com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Why is this the name of this version?
>> >> oc v1.1.2-dirty
>> >>
>> >> Is it because of the new layout or is it deprecated/broken?
>> >
>> > I think you'll see this when you perform a build with files in your
>> > repository that aren't committed.
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> users mailing list
>> >> users lists openshift redhat com
>> >> http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > users mailing list
>> > users lists openshift redhat com
>> > http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]